Why do men treat women like objects

An objectifier thinks that her or his beliefs have come to fit the world, where in fact the world has come to fit her or his beliefs. Men desire women to be this way, and, if they have power, they force women to become this way. Following the norm of Assumed Objectivity, then, men form the belief that women are in fact submissive and object-like, and also that women are like that due to their nature. The norm of Assumed Objectivity, then, yields the belief that women are submissive and object-like, which is true but has the wrong direction of fit Langton , — , along with the false belief that women are naturally this way.

So far, we have looked at various concerns regarding the wrongness involved in objectification. A number of thinkers, however, have challenged the idea that objectification is always morally problematic. Alan Soble questions the widely held Kantian view according to which human dignity is something that people have.

He argues that objectification is not inappropriate. Everyone is already only an object and being only an object is not necessarily a bad thing. In one sense, then, no one can be objectified because no one has the higher ontological status that is required to be reduce-able by objectification. In another sense, everyone is vulnerable to objectification, and everyone can and may be objectified, because to do so is to take them to their correct ontological level.

He writes:. In the case of pornography, then, there is nothing wrong, according to Soble, with treating pornographic actors and models as objects for sexual pleasure and deny their humanity. That is because there is no negative objectification that needs to be taken into moral account.

Leslie Green is another thinker who argues that it is permissible and also required to treat people as objects. As Green explains, people are embodied, extended in space, they exist in time, and they are subject to the laws of nature. People, however, are clearly more than objects. We can treat other people as means only if we at the same time respect their integrity as agents with their own purposes Green , As Green emphasises, there is no prohibition against treating a person as a means as an instrument Green , According to Green, when people are old, severely disabled, or chronically unemployed what they fear the most is that they no longer are of use to others.

She offers a systematic analysis of objectification, a concept not at all easy to define and one that writers on the topic have not sufficiently clarified, as she acknowledges Nussbaum , According to Nussbaum, there are seven features involved in the idea of objectification: instrumentality, denial of autonomy, inertness, fungibility, violability, ownership, denial of subjectivity.

A detailed exposition of these seven features is provided in the introduction of this entry. Nussbaum does believe, however, that, among these seven notions, instrumentality is especially problematic, and is often linked to other forms of objectification Nussbaum , In fact, Nussbaum criticises MacKinnon and Dworkin for conceiving of objectification as a necessarily negative phenomenon Nussbaum , Objectification is negative , when it takes place in a context where equality, respect and consent are absent.

Furthermore, Connie and Mellors do not treat each other merely as means for their purposes, according to Nussbaum. Even though they treat each other as tools for sexual pleasure, they generally regard each other as more than that.

The two lovers, then, are equal and they treat one another as objects in a way that is consistent with respecting each other as human beings. If every time a person is treated or merely seen by another, say, as an instrument not a mere instrument for some further purpose, we take it that the person in question is objectified, then it seems that in our daily lives we objectify nearly everyone, including ourselves. Inevitably, we use each other and ourselves instrumentally all the time for instance, I use a taxi driver as a means to get to my destination, I use myself as a means to prepare a meal, etc.

Papadaki argues that if objectification is to be a meaningful concept, we need to restrict it. Halwani is also in favor of a narrower conception of objectification. According to this view, if someone merely sees or regards another in a sexual way, there is no objectification. Nussbaum herself seems to be concerned, at times, about her objectification category being too inclusive. For example, she states that sometimes we do not treat the occurrence of only one of the seven notions on her list as sufficient for objectification Nussbaum , However, Papadaki suggests, she does not give us enough guidance as to how we can decide whether objectification is present when a person is treated in one of the seven ways she mentions.

Recently, Nancy Bauer has expressed scepticism regarding the possibility of laying out a set of criteria for what counts as sexual objectification. She argues that it is difficult to specify the marks and features of a term that plays a normative role in our mutually shared worldview. According to the shift in question, in a context in which women experience widespread, systematic, diachronic, and structural disadvantages, certain ways of perceiving and representing women tend to cause them material and psychological harm.

This is the case even if she is not in a position to specify exactly its marks and features. Much recent feminist work has been devoted to comprehensive philosophical analyses of objectification, which will hopefully lead to more complete and coherent understandings of this notion. Beauvoir, Simone de feminist philosophy, interventions: epistemology and philosophy of science feminist philosophy, interventions: ethics feminist philosophy, interventions: social epistemology feminist philosophy, topics: perspectives on power feminist philosophy, topics: perspectives on sex and gender feminist philosophy, topics: perspectives on sex markets pornography: and censorship.

Kant on sexuality and objectification 2. Pornography and objectification 3. Feminine appearance and objectification 4. Objectivity and Objectification 5. The possibility of positive objectification 6. The futility of specifying the marks and features of objectification 7.

Pornography and objectification Like Kant, anti-pornography feminists Catharine MacKinnon and Andrea Dworkin take inequality to be tightly linked to objectification.

Feminine appearance and objectification It has been pointed out by some feminist thinkers that women in our society are more identified and associated with their bodies than are men, and, to a greater extent than men, they are valued for how they look Bartky ; Bordo , Objectivity and Objectification MacKinnon introduces the idea that there are important connections between objectivity and objectification.

Haslanger discusses a norm, which is often used by objectifiers, the norm of Assumed Objectivity , which consists of the following four sub-norms: Epistemic neutrality : one must take a genuine regularity in the behaviour of something to be a consequence of its nature. The possibility of positive objectification So far, we have looked at various concerns regarding the wrongness involved in objectification.

Do not treat people as objects, we are told. Calogero, R. A test of objectification theory: The effect of the male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Self-objectification in women: Causes , consequences , and counteractions American Psychological Association, Grabe, S. Body objectification and depression in adolescents: The role of gender, shame, and rumination. That swimsuit becomes you: sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance.

Tiggemann, M. The role of self-objectification in disordered eating, depressed mood, and sexual functioning among women: A comprehensive test of objectification theory. Loughnan, S. Pacilli, M. Sexualization reduces helping intentions towards female victims of intimate partner violence through mediation of moral patiency. Rudman, L. Buss, D. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures.

Brain Sci. Singh, D. Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Eagly, A. The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. Jeffreys, S. Beauty and misogyny: Harmful cultural practices in the West Routledge, Harris, L.

Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: Neuroimaging responses to extreme out-groups. Social groups that elicit disgust are differentially processed in mPFC. Gazzola, V.

The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions. Neuroimage 35 4 , — Krach, S. Can machines think? Interaction and perspective taking with robots investigated via fMRI. PLoS One 3 7 , e Vaes, J. Minimal humanity cues induce neural empathic reactions towards non-human entities.

Neuropsychologia 89 , — Waytz, A. Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism. Heflick, N. Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others.

Google Scholar. Are sexualized women complete human beings? Why men and women dehumanize sexually objectified women.

From women to objects: Appearance focus, target gender, and perceptions of warmth, morality and competence. Cikara, M. From agents to objects: sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets.

Reed, C. The body-inversion effect. Turning configural processing upside down: Part and whole body postures. Bernard, P. Integrating sexual objectification with object versus person recognition: The sexualized-body-inversion hypothesis. Cogoni, C, et al. Understanding the mechanisms behind the sexualized-body inversion hypothesis: The role of asymmetry and attention biases. PLoS One 13 4 Tarr, M. Volkow, N. Reward, dopamine and the control of food intake: Implications for obesity.

Trends Cogn. When the body becomes no more than the sum of its parts: The neural correlates of scrambled versus intact sexualized bodies. Neuroreport 29 1 , 48—53 The neural correlates of cognitive objectification.

Ito, T. Race and gender on the brain: Electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Tomelleri, S. On the nature of gender categorization. Picton, T. The P wave of the human event-related potential. Donchin, E. Is the P component a manifestation of context updating?

Amon, M. Visual Attention in mixed-gender groups. Johannes, S. Luminance and spatial attention effects on early visual processing. Brain Res. Revealing clothing does not make the object: ERP evidences that cognitive objectification is driven by posture suggestiveness, not by revealing clothing.

Nussbaum, M. Objectification in Sex and Social Justice ed. Nussbaum , M. Dill, K. Effects of exposure to sex-stereotyped video game characters on tolerance of sexual harassment. Yao, M. Sexual priming, gender stereotyping, and likelihood to sexually harass: Examining the cognitive effects of playing a sexually-explicit video game.

Sex Roles 62 , 77—88 Smith, D. Martins Press, Westfall, J. Unpublished manuscript. Delorme, A. Methods , 9—21 Lopez-Calderon, J. The longer a husband can at least occasionally regard his wife as a sex object, the better their marriage. It is not always easy to perceive the woman you see every day, the mother of your children, as a sexual object.

Are all the women who wear lingerie, bikinis, cheerleader outfits, or whatever else turns their partner on — and hopefully them as well, one might add — haters of women? If your husband denies these assertions, he is lying to you because he is afraid you will react angrily or because he is afraid of hurting your feelings. It is a sign of the times that these eight points need to be spelled out. The question is, Why?

Why are any of these points — known to just about every woman and man who ever lived prior to the s — controversial to so many well-educated people today? Avoidance of pain is the central psychological impetus of leftism. Leftists deny reality for two reasons. One is that leftism is a religion a secular one , and therefore it has dogmas that supersede truth. The other reason is that reality is filled with disappointment and pain, and avoidance of pain is the central psychological impetus of leftism.

These rooms — replete with stuffed animals, balloons, and Play-Doh — exist to protect students from hearing an idea with which they differ.

Recall the first reason leftists deny reality: It is a religion allows that no heretical ideas. Safe zone are also meant to keep students from hearing an idea that causes them pain. Sign in. Thanks for reading Scientific American. Create your free account or Sign in to continue. See Subscription Options. Discover World-Changing Science.

Get smart. Sign up for our email newsletter. Sign Up. Support science journalism.